|
Title: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: Sworkhard on April 02, 2010, 12:20:30 PM Does anyone know if there is a difference between the left and right axle assemblies for automatic and manual transmissions. I've tried looking on Honda parts websites but I can't seem to find what I'm looking for. The reason I ask is I can find several assemblies available in Canada but they are listed specifically for the automatic where the parts websites based in the states don't seem to specify a transmission.
Thanks, Stephen Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: Mike on April 02, 2010, 12:55:52 PM Majestic Honda shows 2 different part numbers for each side, and each transmission type. I would assume based on this information that they are different. Diagrams can be seen here.
AT Diagram (http://www.hondaautomotiveparts.com/auto/jsp/mws/prddisplay.jsp?inputstate=5&catcgry1=ACCORD&catcgry2=2003&catcgry3=4DR+EXL&catcgry4=KA5AT&catcgry5=DRIVESHAFT+%28L4%29+%28AT%29) MT Diagram (http://www.hondaautomotiveparts.com/auto/jsp/mws/prddisplay.jsp?inputstate=5&catcgry1=ACCORD&catcgry2=2003&catcgry3=4DR+EXL&catcgry4=KA5MT&catcgry5=DRIVESHAFT+%28L4%29+%28MT%29) AT Right = 1088897, and 1094431 AT Left = 1088900, and 1094433 MT Right = 1088898, and 1094432 MT Left = 1090954, and 1094434 This site does not use Honda part numbers* Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: Sworkhard on April 02, 2010, 03:28:21 PM Thanks. That's what I needed to know. I've found some that specify the mt now at autozone, so I ordered those..
Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: timot_one on April 09, 2010, 01:07:22 AM ^Good idea. There is a difference between the MT and AT axles. I was sold a set of AT axles (I was not told) and found out later that they do not fit an MT equipped car.
Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: Mike on April 09, 2010, 08:42:36 AM What was different the number of splines?
Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: timot_one on April 09, 2010, 09:56:16 AM The AT was smaller than the MT. From what Paul explained to me yesterday, I belive this only applies to the K24s.
Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: Mike on April 09, 2010, 10:00:24 AM I have no issues with axles I was just asking to get a perspective for the future.
Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: timot_one on April 09, 2010, 11:39:48 AM I understand. I was just throwing that out there for general info.
Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: Sworkhard on April 26, 2010, 04:52:27 PM I ended up going with raxles (raxles.com) since the ones from autozone looked really cheap and didn't come with harmonic dampers. The raxles seem like a much higher quality product.
Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: asnstyle22 on April 26, 2010, 05:04:01 PM how much did it cost for the raxles? i was gonna go driveshaft shop for some stronger axles
Title: Re: Axle assembly - MT vs AT Post by: Sworkhard on April 28, 2010, 01:37:37 AM IIRC they were $140 each. Not sure if they are any stronger than oem, but they are definitely better than the cheap cardone axles.
|