Axle assembly - MT vs AT

[Sworkhard]

Does anyone know if there is a difference between the left and right axle assemblies for automatic and manual transmissions.  I've tried looking on Honda parts websites but I can't seem to find what I'm looking for.  The reason I ask is I can find several assemblies available in Canada but they are listed specifically for the automatic where the parts websites based in the states don't seem to specify a transmission.

Thanks,

Stephen

[Mike]

Majestic Honda shows 2 different part numbers for each side, and each transmission type. I would assume based on this information that they are different. Diagrams can be seen here.

AT Diagram

MT Diagram


AT Right = 1088897, and 1094431
AT Left = 1088900, and 1094433

MT Right = 1088898, and 1094432
MT Left = 1090954, and 1094434

This site does not use Honda part numbers*

[Sworkhard]

Thanks.  That's what I needed to know.  I've found some that specify the mt now at autozone, so I ordered those..

[timot_one]

^Good idea.  There is a difference between the MT and AT axles.  I was sold a set of AT axles (I was not told) and found out later that they do not fit an MT equipped car.

[Mike]

What was different the number of splines?

[timot_one]

The AT was smaller than the MT.  From what Paul explained to me yesterday, I belive this only applies to the K24s.

[Mike]

I have no issues with axles I was just asking to get a perspective for the future.

[timot_one]

I understand.  I was just throwing that out there for general info.

[Sworkhard]

I ended up going with raxles (raxles.com) since the ones from autozone looked really cheap and didn't come with harmonic dampers.  The raxles seem like a much higher quality product.

[asnstyle22]

how much did it cost for the raxles? i was gonna go driveshaft shop for some stronger axles

[Sworkhard]

IIRC they were $140 each.  Not sure if they are any stronger than oem, but they are definitely better than the cheap cardone axles.